L'arbre de Vie : Seraphine de Senlis 1928 |
Streets of Senlis |
Escaping the platitudes of a colourless existence,
the paintings illuminate life itself in vivid colours and a vitality that
overwhelm observers. Like the vast Gothic cathedral
that dominates the town, guiding our eyes away from the pedestrian level of the
winding streets and alleys, the work of Seraphine captivates us. It leads our
gaze upwards to the heights, to reflection, just as the stained glass and
intricate stonework that adorn the spires.
One of the many churches - not the cathedral which is under restoration and huge netting.... |
Wilhelm Uhde, the art collector of
German nationality and future patron of Seraphine, said that he liked to view
Senlis from the cathedral from where one could see all the hidden gardens,
secreted away from view on ground level by imposing walls and gates, yet from
the heights visible to those ready to see. It was he who discovered Seraphine,
herself hidden away in this labyrinth of grey cobbled streets, the richest,
most intriguing garden of all, masked by the impenetrable façade of her mundane
life and plain unassuming physique.
Seraphine, whose name would seem
both apt and grossly inappropriate at the same time, was indeed an angel with
feet of clay. Like some unfortunate character from a Zola novel, she was born
to a lowly existence in a humble milieu that offered but few chances. Yet Seraphine,
flawed by her splintering sanity and destined to a life or deprivation and
drudgery, did indeed fly up to the heights of creative ecstasy.
Born in late
1864, Seraphine Louis tragically lost her mother on the day of her first birthday and was
orphaned by the age of seven, left to be brought up by her older sister.
Perhaps idealized by the child she had never really known, the missing mother
was sought and prayed to in church, associating the maternal link with that of
the spiritual, Mary, Mother of God. Whatever the ultimate association at the
heart of Seraphine’s faith, she was to remain devote all her life, she who
appeared to have been handed over or abandoned by all those with whom she had
any link.
Seraphine's life was marked by solitude and a nomadic quality. She
moved from town to town, from one household to another without ever
establishing roots anywhere or entering into any real intimacy with anybody.
Without any family bonds, or concrete status to ground her Seraphine would
always be an outsider.
Initially working as a farm hand,
caring for animals around her home town of Arsy Seraphine eventually became a
domestic help in Compiègne, carrying out dull, dirty, physically-demanding
tasks that others would shun. After working at a girls’ institution and various
bourgeois homes in Senlis, at eighteen, she entered the convent Saint Joseph de
Cluny where she continued to perform her menial tasks for the nuns.
Wherever
she found herself, the observance of her faith, her appreciation of the natural
world with its own unique spirituality were central to her life – her ‘real’
life.
During the twenty years she spent in the convent Seraphine’s existence
was measured out by the ecclesiastical routine with its rituals; services, prayers,
hymns, contemplative silences, candle-light and incense. A little like Madame
Bovary, Seraphine surrounded herself with images, hymns and art that
romantically heightened her senses and receptivity.
Below her placid exterior a
frenetic vitality was taking form, as yet unsure to the way in which it would
manifest itself and burst to the surface. There was no apparent artistic
inclination at this stage, although it is said that Seraphine had liked to
watch the drawing lessons carried out in the girls’ school. She discreetly
observed and absorbed yet let nothing show on her impassive exterior for the moment.
Although the reason remains
unclear, Seraphine decided to leave the convent at the age of 38. Perhaps this
was a late act of rebellion or expression of independence. In spite of her
placid façade Seraphine had a determined, decided streak like that displayed by
animals, following some inborn vital instinct.
Outside the museum - Senlis |
She refused to attend the early
Mass provided for the humble folk such as herself and insisted on going to the
11 o’clock service reserved for the bourgeois; it was her right.
Senlis streets - often used as backclothes for films |
Freed from the rigid confines
imposed by a life isolated from the active world beyond grey walls Seraphine
would nevertheless follow a similar cloistered path for the rest of her days. Her existence was indeed dominated by degrees of seclusion, isolation,
exclusion, withdrawal and finally internment in a mental asylum where she was
kept behind walls till the end of her life. However Seraphine’s life went far
beyond any confines, or restrictions set upon it and was about to enter a
wholly new plane as she reached middle age.
More cobbled streets that have attracted film directors. |
Whilst Zola’s characters are
portrayed in urban and rural scenes of unremitting poverty, squalor,
promiscuity and violence, the hardships endured by Seraphine are rendered
insignificant by the beauty and richness of her burgeoning private world. She
was not just another beast of burden like the others of her lowly cast; her
spiritually-inspired art propelled her into a higher realm, inaccessible to
lesser mortals.
Chartres cathedral |
Inspired like Picassiette before
her, Seraphine was mesmerized by the stained-glass of the cathedral and
churches . The imposing sculptures and paintings awoke in her the nascent spiritual
drive to artistic creativity.
Mural decoration from the House of Picassiette |
Claiming that an angel had addressed her in
church, Seraphine declared that she had been given the holy mission of creating
art devoted to Our Lady. While she felt uncomfortable drawing or working with
watercolour, Seraphine found her medium in paint. From around 1906 she devoted
her nights to her nocturnal ecstasy of creation. Behind closed doors, using nature as her altar
(Françoise Cloarec) and her creation as a gesture of worship Seraphine painted.
With no formal training whatsoever
or any concrete knowledge of art Seraphine asked for advice from the local
artist, a certain Charles Hallo. He must have recognized a vitality in her art since
he claimed she did not need help, but probably saw too that she was not adapted
to any conventional painting class. Again, like Picassiette, she lived her art.
She created instinctively and surrounding herself with her creations.
Seraphine's tin of paints. |
Yet it
would have been difficult to imagine that this peasant woman could feel such an
impulse, let alone possess the skill to realize her art. While Picassiette
lived in his artistic construction, this giant patchwork castle of porcelain,
pottery and pieces of glass, visible to all, Seraphine’s art was largely hidden
away. Her room was a secret shrine, materially impoverished since Seraphine
possessed the strict minimum, yet aesthetically rich. Every surface was
overcome with a wealth of flowers, real or painted whilst religious images
decorated the walls of this very private personal space.
From the museum at Senlis. |
To the outside world, Seraphine
struck an odd figure, eccentric yet unremarkable. Dressed in black, with her
painted straw hat and wicker basket, she would scurry from one arduous task to another,
seemingly content to follow unquestioningly the life fate had served her. Little
revealed the rich internal life inside her, the vividness of her vision, the
spirituality that was the base of her life. The wealth and fecundity of
Seraphine’s art, in theme and production, would not find a parallel in her actual
life. Her existence was sterile of any emotional and physical intimacy, and
left her without children; barren. More tragic still, the end of this artist’s
life was devoid of any artistic creation, Seraphine had been abandoned by her
spiritual muse, deserted by all.
Using the industrial paint Ripolin
as her base medium, Seraphine had taught herself to mix in other ‘secret’
ingredients to produce the vibrant colours, rich textures and enamelled
finishes that still stun observers today and continue to baffle art experts as
to their exact composition. One such ingredient was holy oil taken from the
churches to give the painting a special force, thus continuing this spiritual
bond in the actual creative process. While the theme of Seraphine’s art defies
simple narrative, its visual impact is no less powerful. There are no human
portraits – or representations of any living sentient creature – except for a
bursting, rustling abundance of flowers, fruit, plants and trees that defy
categorization. Flowers that look like feathers, flourish alongside buds like
ambling caterpillars, fruit that resembles mystic eyes and leaves that rise
upwards like ceremonial candles. This communion with the natural world did not
however give rise to organic, or cyclical work. Indeed, piece was unique;
self-contained, closed in on itself yet open to the spiritual. The paintings appear
to have been conceived and realized in a spontaneous manner, carried out
directly onto the canvas without preliminary work.
Guided by the Virgin, Seraphine
claimed that she was a mere instrument, to whom spiritual forces would dictate.
She herself would immerse herself in an atmosphere of other-worldlinesss. As
she painted, Seraphine continually sang hymns, leaving the window to her modest
room open to maintain this communication with the ‘above’. As her vibrant
painted prayers counterbalanced the dismal nature of her day-time work (“les travaux noirs”) Seraphine devoted
increasing amounts of time to her luminous nocturnal activities. Neighbours
would be disturbed by a singing voice that was far from angelic, children would
laugh at the gruff, hunched figure passing in the streets, scavenging for old
wood and board on which to paint, sharp-tongued women would mock this
“slattern”. Nothing, however, distracted Seraphine from her mission. With her
frugal means she had just enough money to live her modest life – her only
luxury being the purchase of her painting materials and the wine which she
claimed ‘fortified’ her. Many of her basic needs were met by offering her
artwork in exchange, to the point that the town must have had a considerable
number of paintings, all dismissed, at best, as the strange dabblings of the
poor village singleton/simpleton. It was one such painting that caught the eye
of Wilhelm Uhde in a chance meeting of artistic genius in 1912.
Coming across a painting that Seraphine had
given her employers, Uhde no doubt found it inconceivable that the plain,
simple woman who cleaned his private rooms could produce such intense work. The
piece in question, a painting of apples, left Uhde physically affected, such
was the effect it had on him. He said that he was literally dumbfounded by the
powerful representation of the fruit. He immediately recognized in Seraphine,
by her own description “unparalled” (“sans
rivale”), a unique artist. Her work recalled the visceral drive – the vital
force “élan vital” of Gothic art
bursting upwards in a vertical movement of spiritual spontaneity, unlike the
classical work of the Renaissance with its studied, horizontal growth
(Françoise Cloarec). Seraphine herself admitted that she liked to experience
the unleashed energy and force of the natural world through the violence of
stormy weather, with its lashing rain and driving winds. Demanding to see other
work, Seraphine began to present Uhde with other paintings that she had
produced. So commenced a strange relationship that was based on a mutual need
of art; on the one side the driven artist, on the other the connoisseur who
became patron and ‘enabler’ to this singular woman .
Although from two different worlds
in almost every respect, not least in affluence, privilege and education, the
lives of Uhde and Seraphine shared certain elements. Uhde’s refusal to follow
through his parent’s professional ambitions for him in the legal field, his
determination to forge a career in art appreciation, his unshakeable faith in
his artistic protégés, his rejection of Nazi ideology and finally even his
homosexuality at this time in history made of this German a unique figure. To a
degree, his determined drive found a parallel in the dogged, blunt direction of
Seraphine – both her art and personality – refusing to compromise or deviate.
After an intense period spent in
Paris, organizing exhibitions for Le Douannier Rousseau, Uhde had wanted to lose himself
in calmer environment. Senlis represented a retreat from the hectic
professional and city life of Paris, situated at one hour’s distance from the
capital. Like Seraphine, he appreciated the secluded atmosphere of the Medieval
town. Initially founded on an important crossroad by the Romans, Senlis later
housed the Kings of France over ten centuries. This then was a town of royalty
and religion; it was in Senlis that Clovis decided to embrace the Christian
faith. Here Uhde felt that the myriad of streets afforded him a certain
anonymity and he appreciated the calm, reflective atmosphere offered by this
town of twenty churches. He found the quality of the light unique in this grey
town, where the skies overhead offered a strange, pure luminosity. The
townsfolk of Senlis may have muttered about this foreigner, yet they largely
left him to get on with his personal business. This again mirrored the attitude
of the inhabitants towards Seraphine; people left her to her odd behaviour. Her
initial displays of oddness, such as painting a church statue of the Virgin
Mary pink, were “des caprices” to be
tolerated, albeit grudgingly. Uhde, like the unsophisticated “paysanne” Seraphine, was to be
perceived as an outsider, a German in post-1871 France. The art that he managed
to collect in the years prior to the First World War was confiscated by the
French state once war was declared. When later returning to France after the Great
War he was treated with suspicion. Not surprisingly, he was also later vilified
by the Nazis for his interest in “perverse” art forms such as Cubism and
Fauvism, and for daring to associate a landmark figure in German history with a
representative of such foreign perversion; Picasso (cf Uhde’s biography.De Bismarck à Picasso).
Above all, it was Uhde’s skill at
recognizing, actually feeling great
art, that brought he and Seraphine together. While this simple, comparatively
inexpressive woman found it hard to reveal herself adequately in conversation
with Uhde, she struck a chord with him aesthetically. In art Uhde and Seraphine
met on an essential, visceral primitive level that preceeded words. The feeling
that Uhde experienced in front of one of Seraphine’s works recalled those that
he was subject to when faced with other great innovative art. The work of such artists
as that of Le Douannier Rousseau, Cézanne, Braque, Gauguin, Bonnard and of
course Picasso, all affected him. Seraphine, however, was different from his
other artists. These artists, whatever their milieu, had some notion of the
creative process; they exchanged ideas in the artistic circle and studied the
work of others. Seraphine meanwhile was a virgin, an innocent who painted
instinctively out of some primitive need. Uhde had fallen upon Seraphine’s
strange meandering path in a chance encounter in this slumbering fairy-tale
town whereas his meeting with the other artists had been less serendipitous.
Some had been presented to him - his wife from his lavender mariage (the future
Sonia Delauney) had introduced him to Le Dounnier Rousseau - or they had
presented themselves to him in the heady city of Paris which favoured such
creative contact.
In Uhde, Seraphine was finally
given the recognition and récompense
for all her labour of love. Here indeed was a person of discerning taste, able
to see beyond, or rather below the surface of her paintings, someone who could
feel the pulsating vitality of her work. With his enthusiasm and encouragement
Seraphine created prodigiously, eager to present Uhde with her latest works on
his frequent visits to Senlis. Albeit a devoted, faithful servant Seraphine
remained ever-resistant to any outside suggestion that she modify her style.
She would execute her art but essentially it was her spiritual inspiration, her
devotion to Mary that guided her hand, not a terrestrial lead or influence.
Little by little the menial chores that earned her but a pittance were of increasing
insignificance in the life of Seraphine. The execution of her painting took up
more and more of Seraphine’s time and thoughts, an activity verging on the
obsessional. The resulting art was flamboyant, ever-more vital and vivid and started
to take on imposing proportions.
Detail of L'arbre de la Vie |
It was around this early period of
creative fruition that historical events took precedence in the harmonious
world of Senlis. These events would finally put a halt on the symbiotic
relationship between Uhde and Seraphine, and tear apart the peace and
tranquility that had reigned in Northern France. Even before the outbreak of
the First World War in 1914, Uhde had been warned to leave France for his own
safety. Thus obliged to abandon all his artistic missions, he left behind his
rich collections and turn his back on his protégés; Seraphine was now alone.
Fully immersed in her art, Seraphine
tried to buffer herself against the outside reality – the war-torn town beyond her
own room, her inner sanctum. Yet despite being used to solitude and the life of
a loner, Seraphine was to be changed irremediably. The four years of hostilites
spent in the town she refused to leave made of Seraphine a scarred recluse. Senlis
had witnessed the mass exodus of inhabitants fearful of the bombings, the trench
warfare and the marauding troups of German soldiers who had taken over Northern
France. Seraphine, however, chose to stay on resolutely, occupying her familiar
territory. Besieged in her room in a deserted town she incorporated into her
art such patriotic elements as the tricolour flag as a mark of resistance
against the occupying forces. The town was ransacked and partly ravaged by
fire, but Seraphine remained in place with just sufficient means for physical
survival. And survive she did, but the psychological scars of her war
experience could not be removed.
The pulsions and imaginings that
had always run current to Seraphine’s artistic drive started to assume a
strange, unstoppable force. Her appearance and behaviour were changed, her bizarre
gait and layered clothing gave her a strange aspect that alarmed the townsfolk.
Perhaps a little like the Mad Meg of Brueghel’s painting, Seraphine no longer
faded into the background; she was visibly odd. During the war years Seraphine had
patiently waited for Uhde to return. She expected him to reappear, unannounced,
to deliver her from her isolation, liberate her from her total state of
deprivation. The scarcity of food and sleep, the constant emotional stress and
the lack of the basics essential to rudimentary comfort were perhaps of little
consequence compared to the absence of Seraphine’s creative confident, Uhde.
Possibly convinced that she had abandoned the town for good, or had perhaps been
killed during the occupation, Uhde did not return to Senlis after the war to
recover Seraphine. Indeed, he and his sister settled in the nearby town of
Chantilly. Seraphine was left to wait for an increasingly improbable return, left
to perform her menial tasks and accomplish her art. Yet Uhde and Seraphine’s
paths had not separated definitively, but would not cross for some thirteen
years.
Hearing of an exhibition of the
work of local artists in the town hall of Senlis in October 1927 Uhde was taken
aback to find several large paintings by Seraphine. These dominated the walls,
shadowing the insignificant Sunday creations of ‘worthier’ townsfolk. Although
Seraphine’s art was belittled by the narrow-minded people of Senlis, the
interest it generated in Paris was electrifying. An article in the press
concerning these works sparked a growing curiosity in this peasant woman’s art so
that Seraphine’s art became the object of much attention and subsequent praise.
Avant-garde in his taste, Uhde had correctly recognised Seraphine to be an
artist like few others.
Other art critics now sensed that same primal force
which Uhde had initially identified. Even the local newspaper, both obsequious
and mocking in tone, was obliged to acknowledge ‘their’ Seraphine, referred to as the
local Le Douanier Rousseau. Nevertheless the acknowledgment of Seraphine’s art
was finally set in motion. Fearing that some other critic would snatch up these
unique pieces, Uhde bought the exhibition paintings and later presented himself
again to their creator, after all the years of silence.
Recognizing an artistic phenomenon
rarely encountered, even in the modern art he so favoured, Uhde became
Seraphine’s patron, actively encouraging her to devote herself solely to her
art. How strange it was to find such an “immense and complex world” born from a
woman whose life could be resumed in a few basic sentences. He compared her
trajectory to that of Joan of Arc’s; both women led by a calling from God,
ready to burn for their mission. From that moment Seraphine would hand over her
work to her new master and mentor, Uhde. He prepared the paintings for exhibit
and sale not just in Paris, but in Germany too.
With new means, and an
overwhelming urge to paint, Seraphine’s art entered a period of great
productivity and aesthetic wonder. L’Arbre
Rouge, L’Arbre de Vie and Les Lilas Blancs date from this period and
expose the mastery of Seraphine’s vision and technique. Largely rejecting the
expensive paints brought in from Paris, in preference of her secret
concoctions, Seraphine would nevertheless devore the ever-bigger canvases that
were now delivered to Senlis for her benefit. Her paintings grew significantly
in size, ever larger and taller in order to be closer to her source of
inspiration, the Virgin. The application of paint became increasingly elaborate
as touches of colour added a jewel-like quality to the finish, flowers, adorned
with beads and feathers, would assume other forms and the whole would glow and
vibrate with an inner light and vitality. Seraphine claimed that she did not
need much light with which to work since the paintings themselves provided
their own luminosity. Uhde’s sister Anne-Marie remarked that the life bursting
out from one painting of flowers would prevent her from sleeping, such was the
force exuded from the efflorescence of the blooms.
Seraphine herself had no doubts as
to the significance of her art. She shrugged off any comparison to the
paintings of Uhde’s other, naturally lesser, Modern Primitive discoveries.
Camille Bombois and Louis Vivin were for Seraphine mere dabblers since their
work bore no spiritual essence; her painting was Art in the most sacred sense
of the term. For Seraphine art was not a leisure, it was the result of a
calling; creation was a duty. From a tone that was initially exhilarating yet increasingly
disquietening, Seraphine’s art was to enter a new phase.
Manic in her drive to paint,
Seraphine would lose herself in her work, literally depriving herself of food
and sleep through her labour of love, using only her fervent devotion and
special wine to sustain her. The whispering spiritual voices that had always
accompanied her now became more insistent and Seraphine’s conversations with
them louder and louder. No longer acts and visual representations of devotion
to God, Seraphine’s art seemed to assume a worrying, mutating aspect There was
now a sense of latent threat and approaching apocalypse. The harmony and
beatitude of Seraphine’s art now gave way to a hint of discord and unease.
Parallel to this, Seraphine herself changed from a relatively docile,
unassuming figure to one that was capricious, demanding, over-proud and given
to the extravagant purchase of frivolous articles. Sadly these were not the
simple caprices of the artist discovering the heady effect of fame and success;
these excessive acts would mark the beginning of an irremediable decline.
Following the 1929 exhibition, Les
peintres du Cœur sacré, that Uhde organized Seraphine gained more renown
and received a significant sum of money for her work. Relative fame fed
distortions in her self-perception whilst the spending of the ‘serious’ money that
her painting could now generate distracted Seraphine. Indulging in a new-found
materialism, Seraphine took no heed of Uhde’s warnings of the dangers of such
excess at this time. On the contrary she felt hostile when admonished for her
spending and became secretive and reclusive. She would add to the numerous
paddocks and chains that already ‘protected’ her room from intruders, taunters
and the Evil Eye, refusing to receive visitors, even Uhde or his sister.
The artistic climate was indeed beginning
to feel the repercussions of the post-war Great Depression, whilst the clouds
of political unrest in Europe cast a shadow over Parisian art markets. The demand
for art was diminishing and consequently Seraphine’s painting was selling less.
Unable to keep up with the exorbitant bills that Seraphine’s expenses were
producing, feeling frustrated and perhaps a little frightened by the behaviour
of his protégée, Uhde started to distance himself from his protégée. This may
not have been wholly intentional on Uhde’s part, but Seraphine certainly felt
the full impact of this ‘abandon’. Fearing that her art would fall into
oblivion, her means of a living cut off, her source of recognition and encouragement
denied her Seraphine slipped into unsafe territory.
Little by little Seraphine seemed
to lose the sense of direction and security that her art afforded her. The more
she was invaded by the material concerns of the ‘real’ world, the more she lost
her grip on all sense of reality. Away from the safe confines of her own
visionary universe, Seraphine could not cope with the multitude of demands that
the concrete world seemed to make of her. Inborn eccentricities were no longer
contained, stabilized and channeled by her painting but were given free rein.
The artist was overwhelmed, finally rendered powerless and unproductive as she
entered a grey void.
Winding, anonymous streets of the town of Senlis. |
The voices that now filled
Seraphine’s head gave her headaches, drowning out the peaceful words of the
Virgin. Seraphine no longer heard the gentle poetry of her inspiration; now she
was simply subject to the discordant cries of hysterical messages. She was
‘told’ to buy her wedding trousseau for
her approaching marriage to a certain Cyrille – possibly a pure figment of her
imagination and wishful thinking – and later given orders to act as a messenger
to herald oncoming doom. Increasingly vocal in her missions, Seraphine strayed
from her room, dismissing her painting as she started to haunt the streets of
Senlis. Preaching and muttering to fleeing passers-by Seraphine became an image of insanity like Dulle Driet.
Dulle Griet - Pieter Bruegel - 1562 |
Feeling shunned by Uhde,
forgotten by the art world, abandoned by her creative inspiration, no longer
able to converse with the Virgin Mary, Seraphine felt herself to be
insignificant and believed that her art was now redundant. While she felt
herself to be invisible to the world, she nevertheless drew the attention of
the townsfolk around her. Disapproval grew as Seraphine’s eccentricities took
on an increasingly anti-social, manic form. Seraphine was convinced that she
was being persecuted by certain members of the town, targeted by a campaign to
poison her, and yet also believed herself witness to several criminal acts of
sex abuse and murder on the part of members of the clergy.
Asile psychiatrique Clermont (men's block). |
Perhaps in an
attempt to redeem her extravagant material sins, or to prepare for her ‘imminent’
departure to Spain to marry her fictive fiancé Cyrille, Seraphine began to
lighten herself of her worldly possessions. Desperate to accomplish this new
mission Seraphine was finally apprehended by the police as she was found
depositing strange bundles of her belongings around the town. The doctors who
examined her soon declared that Seraphine was victim to serious psychosis and
represented a danger to herself and the community. Once sectioned, Seraphine
was physically removed from the ‘real’ world which she had ceased to inhabit
for some time. At first sent to a local hospital, Seraphine was then
transferred to the large mental asylum in Clermont-de-l’Oise where she would
spend the next ten years, until her death in 1942.
Witches' Sabbath - Goya 1821 |
Uhde attempted to visit Seraphine
in the institution but was warned that this could destabilize her condition
further, as would any pursuit of her artistic activities. Nevertheless he did
manage to fund her care in a private wing so that she finally escaped the
Bedlam-like scenes that had become her daily lot. From the calm and spiritual
reflection that had made up her life alongside the nuns, Seraphine discovered
herself to be in a nightmare community of the insane, surrounded by mad sisters
like herself, worthy of a Goya painting. Although she perhaps found a certain
comfort in the private room Uhde financed, Seraphine never expressed any desire
to paint again, stating that “everything opposes it here”. Like her peer, the
similarly-interned sculptress Camille Claudel (1864-1943), Seraphine turned her back on her
art definitively. Indeed both women plunged into the darkness and sterility of
insanity as they failed to regain either mental equilibrium or artistic
inspiration.
Camille Claudel |
The voices that had invaded
Seraphine’s head and led to her downfall were never silenced; on the contrary. She
demanded paper on which to compose the voluminous, rambling letters she felt
compelled to write. Such letters were addressed to figures of authority in the
institution, the police or clergy – never to Uhde. The missives generally aimed
to warn those concerned of imminent danger, to throw light on some heinous
crime that she was privy to, or simply to indicate that she was the victim of
vile plots. The writings were never the direct, conscious expression of a woman
trying to give voice to the demons inside her. Their voices were all too
apparent, her madness all too visible but Seraphine seemed to be unaware of
their hold on her. Her letters never offered her a therapeutic release, they
simply remained the sprawling transcripts of the play being acted out in
Seraphine’s head.
While Seraphine’s creative life
had ended in barrenness, she herself became obsessed with the notion of procreation and
pregnancy. She believed herself to be pregnant with twins and spent large
amounts of time fretting over their well-being. Severe deprivation began to
make itself felt on every level in the mental institution during the war years.
The task of feeding her imaginary infants and protecting them from the imminent
dangers was Seraphine’s principal concern. Her condition further deteriorated
as her mental health spiralled downwards when her fears shackled her and
psychosis gripped her in its vice. The breast that had never fed any child was now
the source of much suffering as a cancerous tumour was discovered. In pain, yet
racked by worry for her starving infants Seraphine would try to find food in
any form possible in an institution that had nothing more to offer. At night,
like the beasts of burden she had once cared for, she would graze on the
grass in the gardens like a cow, on all fours, cowering in pain and hunger.
Celle qui fut la belle heaulmière : Rodin 1887 |
At the age of 78 Seraphine finally
died, just like thousands of other inmates of psychiatric institutions under
the Vichy regime during the war years and like Camille Claudel herself; ill and
starved to death. While Seraphine had always dreamt of a grand funeral for a
“happy resurrection” she became an anonymous figure, buried in a mass grave.
She who had envisioned the flowers and angels of the world above became a living
version of Claudel’s Clotho, or
Rodin’s Celle qui fut la belle Heaulmière
.
Uhde never saw his protégée after her internment and believed that she had
died years before her actual death. He himself died five years after her in
1947, having spent years fleeing the Gestapo due to his support of degenerates
such as Seraphine. Uhde lost his German nationality and was never to obtain that
of the French nation yet he was finally buried on French soil – in the cemetery
Montparnasse in Paris. An exhibition room was named in Uhde’s honour in the
Musée National d’Art Moderne of Paris in 1948 in recognition of the German who
had contributed so much to French art. Two paintings by Seraphine of Senlis were
exhibited there.
Louis Wain's cats portraying his decline in mental health |
The biggest injust suffered by
Seraphine the artist was the lack of acknowledgement of her art for many years
after her death. Her very real talent was perceived as some kind of freak,
chance occurrence from the moment that she was labelled insane. Nevertheless
the nature of her work still defies today any concrete categorization or wholly
satisfying explanation. Although her mind inevitably unraveled, her art
remained intact. Her work was halted abruptly in its prime and does not track
the full descent into insanity or reflect any decline in artistic technique. The
work of Louis Wain mirrored the deterioration of the artist’s mental health, as
his beloved cats morphed into kaleidoscopic, psychedelic cats; Seraphine’s art
remained whole.
A beautiful French film was made in 2008, Séraphine de Senlis. Directed by Martin
Provost, the film was awarded seven Cesars from the French Academy, including best film and best
actress for for Yolande Moreau’s incredible interpretation
of the artist. However it somehow failed to do justice to the full luminosity
and vibrancy of Seraphine’s work, as the breath-taking colours of the paintings
were rather submerged and subdued by the dark scenes of the sets. Seraphine’s
vivid art seems somewhat toned down and trapped in the grisaille and discretion of the town of Senlis.
Several books have
been written (in French) which have truly brought Seraphine to life – the two that I read
(Alain Vircondelet: Séraphine: de la
Peinture à la Folie. Albin Michel 2008 and Séraphine by Françoise Cloarec. Libretto 2011) gave form to the art
and artist. More importantly still, there was
a large exhibition of Seraphine’s work in the Musée Maillol, Paris in 2008,
which I missed since I’d never heard of this artist!
The poster that I bought
during my recent visit to the Musée d’Art et d’Archéologie at Senlis is now on the
wall at the foot of my bed; I look at it every day and wonder about the
enigmatic process of artistic creation…
Should you be interested, I wrote another post on Seraphine after this one:
Seraphine of Senlis at the Maillol.
Should you be interested, I wrote another post on Seraphine after this one:
Seraphine of Senlis at the Maillol.
An artist myself, I just happened upon the
ReplyDeletemovie on Netflix.
Now I can not find out enough about this
wonderful artist. What a story and what a life.
Art does consume us.
Hello! I've just been to the Musée Maillol in Paris where I saw the collection of Seraphine paintings there... I might squeeze the photos that I took into the post above, or just do another one...This time I tried to get right up close to the works this time in order to see the crackling effects, the paint strokes, dabs and flecks etc. I hope the photos do justice!
ReplyDeleteThe life of many artists must have been so hard, but at least their art survives, leaving an indelible trace denied many other people who had an existence of relative comfort. Art does consume, but also drives us beyond our ordinary sphere - certainly in the case of Seraphine.
I adored the movie of Seraphine (having never heard of her before) but agree that the art was not given its rightful prominence. I would have loved to have seen more long well lite scenes for I loved her art immeadiately. Thankyou so much for this wonderful blog I have appreciated reading about this unique creative force called Seraphine. She was certainly a facinating character and today of course she would have been put on medication so I wonder how much art she would have produced in that case and how many unique creative people are as I write are numbed by medication which inhibits that manic creative side.
ReplyDeleteKaren Abrahamson
Australia
Thanks! Yes, it certainly makes you wonder. I think it was the French writer Marcel Proust who said that artists had to choose between art and life. He didn't have mental health issues himself, but did have asthma, and the demands of his art led him to spend hours writing in a hermetically closed room.
ReplyDelete